The committee invites evidence on the operation and effectiveness of the peer review process used to examine and validate scientific results and papers prior to publication.More details.
The Committee welcomes submissions on all aspect of the process and among the issues it is likely to examine are the following:
1. the strengths and weaknesses of peer review as a quality control mechanism for scientists, publishers and the public;
2. measures to strengthen peer review;
3. the value and use of peer reviewed science on advancing and testing scientific knowledge;
4. the value and use of peer reviewed science in informing public debate;
5. the extent to which peer review varies between scientific disciplines and between countries across the world;
6. the processes by which reviewers with the requisite skills and knowledge are identified, in particular as the volume of multi-disciplinary research increases;
7. the impact of IT and greater use of online resources on the peer review process; and
8. possible alternatives to peer review.
The Committee welcomes submissions from scientists whose material has been peer reviewed, those who commission peer reviews and those who carry out peer review.
Monday, February 14, 2011
UK Committee Announce New Inquiry into Peer Review
The UK's House of Commons recently announced the creation of a Select Committee that will inquire into peer review: